Progressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Progressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard

Sean Turner
I’ve received a request to progress RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard.  I plan to initiate the IETF LC today, I will make sure to copy this list in case there are any issues you may be aware of.

spt
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

smime.p7s (2K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: IsmsProgressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard

Wes Hardaker-2
Sean Turner <[hidden email]> writes:

> I’ve received a request to progress RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to
> Internet Standard.  I plan to initiate the IETF LC today, I will make
> sure to copy this list in case there are any issues you may be aware
> of.

Awesome Sean, thank you very much for the work!
--
Wes Hardaker
Parsons
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Progressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard

Sean Turner
In reply to this post by Sean Turner
I’m going to need to redo the last call based on a fat finger.  I’m not moving Teredo to IS.  Dave Harrington’s got a keen eye.

spt

On Jan 01, 2014, at 13:06, Sean Turner <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I’ve received a request to progress RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard.  I plan to initiate the IETF LC today, I will make sure to copy this list in case there are any issues you may be aware of.
>
> spt


_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

smime.p7s (2K) Download Attachment