Review request for payto URI scheme

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Review request for payto URI scheme

Florian Dold
Hello,

This is a review request for the registration of the payto URI scheme,
as per RFC 7595.

It is specified in the following Internet Draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dold-payto/

Cheers,
Florian

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Review request for payto URI scheme

Erik Wilde
hello.

On 2017-04-30 23:51, Florian Dold wrote:
> This is a review request for the registration of the payto URI scheme,
> as per RFC 7595.
> It is specified in the following Internet Draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dold-payto/

without going into any other details: section 3 refers to section 5 and
calls it a "registry". whether a registry for payment schemes is or
isn't a good idea is a different matter, but as it is specified right
now, this is not a registry, but a fixed set of options. if you think
that a registry (that can be extended by adding new entries as the
payment space evolves) is a good idea, then you might want to consider
setting up an IANA registry a la RFC 5226 as part of your draft.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-registries might help as a
general guideline of why and how a registry might be a mechanism for how
to manage the namespace of payment schemes.

cheers,

dret.

--
erik wilde | mailto:[hidden email] |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review