X-Content-Type-Options

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

X-Content-Type-Options

Anne van Kesteren
Header field name: X-Content-Type-Options

Applicable protocol: http

Status: standard

Author/Change controller: WHATWG

Specification document(s):
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#x-content-type-options-header

Related information: N/A


--
https://annevankesteren.nl/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: X-Content-Type-Options

Ted Hardie-2
Hi Anne,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 suggests avoiding the x- construct wherever possible.  Is it possible to go to Content-Type-Options, without the X-?

regards,

Ted Hardie

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[hidden email]> wrote:
Header field name: X-Content-Type-Options

Applicable protocol: http

Status: standard

Author/Change controller: WHATWG

Specification document(s):
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#x-content-type-options-header

Related information: N/A


--
https://annevankesteren.nl/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers


_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: X-Content-Type-Options

Mark Nottingham
It's already widely-deployed, so it's grandfathered in, I think.

https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/gg622941(v=vs.85).aspx


> On 18 May 2017, at 4:56 am, Ted Hardie <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anne,
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 suggests avoiding the x- construct wherever possible.  Is it possible to go to Content-Type-Options, without the X-?
>
> regards,
>
> Ted Hardie
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Header field name: X-Content-Type-Options
>
> Applicable protocol: http
>
> Status: standard
>
> Author/Change controller: WHATWG
>
> Specification document(s):
> https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#x-content-type-options-header
>
> Related information: N/A
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-message-headers mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-message-headers mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: X-Content-Type-Options

Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Mark Nottingham <[hidden email]> wrote:
> It's already widely-deployed, so it's grandfathered in, I think.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/gg622941(v=vs.85).aspx

That is exactly it. I think everyone knows better now, so I wouldn't
expect much more of these, but it's also not worth the effort of
trying to get rid of the prefix and adding all the complexity of
supporting two headers meanwhile.


--
https://annevankesteren.nl/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
Loading...